Most popular

Who ruled Rome the shortest?

Who ruled Rome the shortest?

Otho
The Shortest Ruling Roman Emperors of the Principate Period

Rank Roman Emperor Length of Rule
1 Otho 92 days
2 Pertinax 87 days
3 Didius Julianus 66 days
4 Gordian I 21 days

Who was the shortest King?

King Louis XIX: 20 Minutes The reigning King Charles X stepped aside in favor of his son Louis. King Louis XIX’s reign was the shortest in history, lasting only 20 minutes.

Which pope had the shortest reign?

Popes with the shortest reigns

  • Urban VII (September 15–September 27, 1590): reigned for 13 calendar days, died before consecration.
  • Boniface VI (April, 896): reigned for 16 calendar days.
  • Celestine IV (October 25–November 10, 1241): reigned for 17 calendar days, died before consecration.

Who was the worst emperor?

READ ALSO:   Is it better to put gravel under concrete?

Nero is perhaps the best known of the worst emperors, having allowed his wife and mother to rule for him and then stepping out from their shadows and ultimately having them, and others, murdered. But his transgressions go far beyond just that; he was accused of sexual perversions and the murder of many Roman citizens.

Who is the worst Emperor in Roman history?

Elagabalus, also known as Heliogabalus, served as a Roman emperor from 218 to 222, a time that significantly impacted his placement on the list of worst emperors. A member of the Severan dynasty, Elagabalus was the second son of Julia Soaemias and Sextus Varius Marcellus, and of Syrian background.

Where does Elagabalus rank on the list of worst emperors?

Elagabalus, also known as Heliogabalus, served as a Roman emperor from 218 to 222, a time that significantly impacted his placement on the list of worst emperors.

Who are the top 10 Roman emperors?

1 Commodus. 2 Nero. 3 Caligula. 4 Maximinus Thrax. 5 Diocletian. 6 Honorius. 7 Elagabalus. 8 Domitian. 9 Septimius Severus. 10 Caracalla.

READ ALSO:   What does constant expression required mean?

How was the legitimacy of an emperor’s rule dependent on?

The legitimacy of an emperor’s rule was dependent upon his control of the army and recognition by the Senate; an emperor would normally be proclaimed by his troops, invested with imperial titles by the Senate, or both. But the Roman people regarded their emperors as the equivalent of kings,…