Guidelines

What challenges did you face during the peer review process?

What challenges did you face during the peer review process?

But, in many cases, book and journal editors are finding it increasingly difficult to attract qualified peer reviewers and establish a dedicated editorial review board.

  • Identifying Qualified Reviewers.
  • The Waiting Game.
  • Retainment.
  • Author Frustration.
  • Lackluster Reviews.
  • Overcoming Challenges.
  • Moving Forward.

How do you respond to a reviewer comment Journal example?

I am/We are grateful to the reviewers for their insightful comments on my paper. I/We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions provided by the reviewers. I/We have highlighted the changes within the manuscript. Here is a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and concerns.

READ ALSO:   What is Fourier Transform in audio?

What does a reviewer do during peer review?

What does a reviewer do during peer review? He reviews the paper looking for errors and makes sure the paper meets standards set down by the scientific community.

What should I write in a peer review?

This can include overview, contribution, strengths & weaknesses, and acceptability. You can also include the manuscript’s contribution/context for the authors (really just to clarify whether you view it similarly, or not), then prioritise and collate the major revisions and minor/specific revisions into feedback.

What are the challenges of receiving peer feedback in peer assessment?

There can some challenges when giving and receiving peer feedback in a peer assessment. Some people can be harsh in their assessments of your work. Some students cannot take that and because of that it can cause them to question a lot of their work. People can also be wrong when it comes to the assessment.

How do you respond to a peer review?

For more tips, visit our guide to editing your work. In general, the editor should be able to provide commentary more closely aligned with the journal’s scope and editorial policies. If the editor disagrees on a suggested edit, you should cite the editor’s comments in your response to the reviewers.

READ ALSO:   Is Hanja important to learn?

How do you reply to a peer review comment?

Responding to reviewers’ comments

  1. Begin by thanking the reviewer for taking the time to assess your manuscript.
  2. Then, specify that you’ve addressed all the concerns they raised.
  3. List all the reviewer’s comments and your answer to each one.
  4. Avoid giving yes or no answers.

What is the role of reviewer in journal?

Reviewers evaluate article submissions to journals based on the requirements of that journal, predefined criteria, and the quality, completeness and accuracy of the research presented. uphold the integrity of the journal by identifying invalid research, and helping to maintain the quality of the journal.

What is the role of the reviewer?

Reviewers have the responsibility to identify strengths and provide constructive comments to help the author resolve weaknesses in the work. Some journals ask reviewers to provide two sets of comments: one for the author and the other for the editor only.

READ ALSO:   Why is pizza an elastic demand?

How do you review a journal example?

Summary

  • Give positive feedback first.
  • Briefly summarize what the paper is about and what the findings are.
  • Try to put the findings of the paper into the context of the existing literature and current knowledge.
  • Indicate the significance of the work and if it is novel or mainly confirmatory.

How do you write a peer review comment?

Do

  1. Justify your recommendation with concrete evidence and specific examples.
  2. Be specific so the authors know what they need to do to improve.
  3. Be thorough. This might be the only time you read the manuscript.
  4. Be professional and respectful.
  5. Remember to say what you liked about the manuscript!