Why are movie sequels worse than the original?
Table of Contents
Why are movie sequels worse than the original?
The third reason why sequels are almost always worse than the original is simply not having enough time. When a sequel, or any movie for that matter, is rushed, the story, characters, dialogue, and action don’t get enough thought put into them, and the film ends up feeling incomplete.
What is the most inappropriate movie?
The 10 Most Offensive Movies Ever Made (& Their Rotten Tomatoes Rating)
- 1 A Serbian Film (2011) – 47\%
- 2 Hounddog (2007) – 15\%
- 3 Cannibal Holocaust (1980) – 65\%
- 4 The Human Centipede (2010) – 50\%
- 5 The Last Temptation of Christ (1988) – 80\%
- 6 I Spit On Your Grave (1978) – 53\%
- 7 Movie 43 (2013) – 5\%
- 8 Salo (1975) – 75\%
What are some of the best movie sequels of all time?
One of the greatest films of the 20th century also had a pretty solid sequel. In fact, The Godfather Part II is more than solid. It’s the greatest movie sequel of all time, telling a story that manages to compliment the first installment without repeating it.
What makes a movie a direct sequel?
Every film on this list is a direct sequel, meaning it was produced as the second film, no matter how many were eventually made. Many of these second installments outstrip their predecessors, telling stories without the burden of introducing characters or plotlines.
What is the sequel to rise about?
The sequel is set ten years after Rise, and it shows audiences a world in which humanity has been largely destroyed. The human characters in this story are secondary, though, to the apes who betray one another and deal in various degrees of mistrust for the humans they encounter.
Is there a movie after Close Encounters?
In an attempt to appease, Spielberg agreed to write a loose follow-up to Close Encounters. The script was titled Night Skies, and it was a macabre film that dealt with aliens terrorizing a family. For one reason or another, the movie never came to fruition.