What is Reader-Response critical theory?

Reader-response criticism is a school of literary theory that focuses on the reader (or “audience”) and their experience of a literary work, in contrast to other schools and theories that focus attention primarily on the author or the content and form of the work.

How many types of reader-response criticism are there?

Results: Reader-response theory could be categorized into several modes including: 1) “Transactional” approach used by Louise Rosenblatt and Wolfgang Iser 2) “Historical context” favored by Hans Robert Juass 3) “Affective stylistics” presented by Stanley Fish 4) “Psychological” approach employed by Norman Holland 5) “ …

What are the theories of criticism?

Broad schools of theory that have historically been important include historical and biographical criticism, New Criticism, formalism, Russian formalism, and structuralism, post-structuralism, Marxism, feminism and French feminism, post-colonialism, new historicism, deconstruction, reader-response criticism, and …

What are the five types of reader-response approach?

Reader-response strategies can be categorized, according to Richard Beach in A Teacher’s Introduction to Reader-Response Theories (1993), into five types: textualCritical approach that emphasizes the text itself (relative to other forms of reader-response criticism); the text directs interpretation as the reader …

What is important in reader response criticism?

Reader-response criticism allows readers to interpret the text in various ways. Allows readers to bring personality traits, memories of the past and present experiences to the text. Forces the readers to look past the words of the text, and search for deeper meanings.

How is reader response criticism done?

Reader-response criticism argues that literature should be viewed as a performing art in which each reader creates their own, possibly unique, text-related performance. It stands in total opposition to the theories of formalism and the New Criticism.

What is an example of reader response criticism?

For example, in Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818), the monster doesn’t exist, so to speak, until the reader reads Frankenstein and reanimates it to life, becoming a co-creator of the text.

What are some common criticism of literary theory?

Examples of some types of literary criticism are:

• Biographical.
• Comparative.
• Ethical.
• Expressive.
• Feminist.
• Historical.
• Mimetic.
• Pragmatic.

Why is the reader important in reader response criticism?

How do you use Reader Response Theory?

Apply the reader-response methodology to works of literature. Engage in the writing process of a peer writer, including peer review. Review and evaluate a variety of reader-response papers by peer writers. Draft and revise a reader-response paper on a literary work.

What is the importance of reader-response approach?

Using a reader response approach helps secondary students become critical readers and thinkers because they are not simply told how to think about a text, but must justify their multiple interpretations of a text using textual evidence and support.

What is reader-response criticism?

At its most basic level, reader-response criticism considers readers’ reactions to literature as vital to interpreting the meaning of the text. However, reader-response criticism can take a number of different approaches.

What is the reader-response theory of reading?

Tyson explains that “…reader-response theorists share two beliefs: 1) that the role of the reader cannot be omitted from our understanding of literature and 2) that readers do not passively consume the meaning presented to them by an objective literary text; rather they actively make the meaning they find in literature” (154).

What is Subjective reader-response theory?

Subjective reader-response theory, associated with David Bleich, looks entirely to the reader’s response for literary meaning as individual written responses to a text are then compared to other individual interpretations to find continuity of meaning.

What does reader response theory share common ground with deconstructionism?

In this way, reader-response theory shares common ground with some of the deconstructionists discussed in the Post-structural area when they talk about “the death of the author,” or her displacement as the (author)itarian figure in the text. How does the interaction of text and reader create meaning?