What is a sword without a point called?

An executioner’s sword is a sword designed specifically for decapitation of condemned criminals (as opposed to combat). These swords were intended for two-handed use, but were lacking a point, so that their overall blade length was typically that of a single-handed sword (ca. 80–90 cm (31–35 in)).

Why did swords have grooves?

A fuller is a rounded or beveled longitudinal groove or slot along the flat side of a blade (e.g., a sword, knife, or bayonet) that is made using a blacksmithing tool called a spring swage or, like the groove, a fuller. A fuller is often used to widen a blade. This effect lessens as the blade is reduced in length.

Why did executioner swords have no point?

Executioners’ swords might be made without a tip, since they were used only for cutting, and would never need a point for stabbing.

How heavy is a claymore sword?

On average, the claymore had a forty-two inch blade and thirteen inch grip, making the total length of the weapon fifty-five inches. Due to its mass, the claymore weighed over five pounds; to carry the abnormally large blade, Scottish clansmen would often use a shoulder sheath to carry their claymores on their backs.

Why were swords not used as a primary battlefield weapon?

This question is hard to answer, as swords were never primary battlefield weapons. They were used as a backup or as a personal defense weapon. In the medieval period, the primary battlefield weapons were spears. Knights went into battle with a poleaxe or other equal as their primary, and had an arming sword as a backup.

What are some examples of non-European weapons called Swords?

Non-European weapons called “sword” include single-edged weapons such as the Middle Eastern scimitar, the Chinese dao and the related Japanese katana.

Why was the longsword called the hand and a half?

The longsword was known for its longer grip, which made it a two-handed sword, and was nicknamed ‘hand and a half’ sword. The sword was used in conjunction with armor mostly during the ‘Hundred Years War’.

Was the sword still used in the 17th century?

No doubt, even in the 17th century when gunpowder and indeed muskets were being increasingly starting to be used in battle, the sword would have played a diminished role compared to that of the High Middle Ages (12th century). However, I am tempted to think the sword lingered on in usage for centuries afterwards.