Helpful tips

How were medics treated in ww2?

How were medics treated in ww2?

They were trained to stop bleeding, apply dressings, sprinkle sulfa powder on wounds as an antiseptic, and to administer morphine as a sedative. More elaborate medical treatment would wait.

When the fighting finally drew to a close what was the military casualties for the combatants totaled estimate as well as civilians casualties?

Among other things, the armistice agreement stated that the fighting of the so-called “War to End All Wars” would end at a set time later that same morning: 11 a.m. When the fighting finally drew to a close, military casualties for the combatants totaled an estimated 30 to 40 million, with millions of additional …

Can you mercy kill in war?

Mercy killing in battle is an illegal activity, yet, the evidence suggests, it happens on battlefields the world over and it has probably done so throughout human history. This may be a ‘silent’ part of the battlefield that few survivors wish to remember or to report subsequently.

READ ALSO:   Which is the better fuel coal or petrol?

Which was responsible for the greatest number of deaths among soldiers during the Civil War?

Most casualties and deaths in the Civil War were the result of non-combat-related disease. For every three soldiers killed in battle, five more died of disease.

How many Iraqi soldiers were killed in Desert Storm?

Allied total losses were estimated to be 250 personnel killed as a direct result of enemy action. Most of the fatalities were American, while 47 British personnel died. According to the Imperial War Museum, between 20,000 and 35,000 Iraqi soldiers died during the ground war.

Why is killing a medic a war crime?

Originally Answered: How is it a war crime to shoot medics? Probably because medics are noncombatants. They do not engage in offensive military operations. They are there to treat wounded soldiers.

Is battlefield mercy killing morally justifiable?

Mercy Killing is not Morally Justifiable The principle-based perspective showed that we could not establish a moral rule that all soldiers should kill severely wounded combatants if they were in a similar situation.