How much were the guards paid in the Stanford Prison Experiment?

More than 70 young men responded to an advertisement about a “psychological study of prison life,” and experimenters selected 24 applicants who were judged to be physically and mentally healthy. The paid subjects—they received $15 a day—were divided randomly into equal numbers of guards and prisoners.

What were the benefits of the Stanford Prison Experiment?

The Stanford Prison Experiment has become one of psychology’s most dramatic illustrations of how good people can be transformed into perpetrators of evil, and healthy people can begin to experience pathological reactions – traceable to situational forces.

What happened to the students after the Stanford Prison Experiment?

For six days, half the study’s participants endured cruel and dehumanizing abuse at the hands of their peers. At various times, they were taunted, stripped naked, deprived of sleep and forced to use plastic buckets as toilets. Some of them rebelled violently; others became hysterical or withdrew into despair.

What error did Zimbardo make in his research?

But Zimbardo had made another serious error: He wanted to create a neutral prison with so-called average participants. He failed to some extent, and the reasons have serious implications in social science experiments.

How did the other prisoners treat Aksionov Brainly?

The prison authorities liked Aksionov for his meekness. Even his fellow prisoners respected him. They called him “Grandfather’ and ‘The Saint’. When they wanted to petition the prison authorities about anything, they always made him their spokesman.

How did the other prisoners treat Aksionov 250 words?

The other prisoners treat Aksionov with respect, as they recognize in his humility and piousness a kind of dignity in spite of the harsh conditions of the prison.

How much did Aksionov carry with him?

Aksionov swore he had not done it; that he had not seen ​the merchant after they had had tea together; that he had no money except eight thousand rubles of his own, and that the knife was not his.

How did the prisoners treat Aksionov answer?

In prison, Aksionov learnt to make boots, and earned a little money with which he bought the book ‘The Lives of the Saints’. The prison authorities liked him for his meekness. His fellow-prisoners respected and called him “Grandfather” and “The Saint.” He was the spokesman among the prisoners.

What can we learn from the Stanford Prison Experiment?

The biggest and most probably, the only lesson learnt from The Stanford Prison Experiment, as mentioned by Phillip Zimbardo himself in one of the interviews is “That human behavior is more influenced by things outside of us, than inside. The situation is the external environment here.”.

What was the hypothesis of the Stanford Prison Experiment?

The Stanford Prison Experiment was designed in 1971 to test the hypothesis that prisoners and guards are self-selecting; this means that the individuals have certain characteristics that 1) determine the group to which they belong; and, 2) encourage undesirable behavior in the group members.

What are the implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment?

What are the implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment In 1971 Dr Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment in the basement of Stanford University . This involved imprisoning nine volunteers in a mock up of Stanford prison, which was policed by nine guards (more volunteers). These guards had complete control over the prisoners.

What was the main finding of Zimbardo’s prison study?

According to Zimbardo and his colleagues, the Stanford Prison Experiment revealed how people will readily conform to the social roles they are expected to play, especially if the roles are as strongly stereotyped as those of the prison guards. What is the main point of the Stanford Prison Experiment?