How do the anarchist define private property?

Anarchists generally agree that private property is a social relationship between the owner and persons deprived (not a relationship between person and thing), e.g. artifacts, factories, mines, dams, infrastructure, natural vegetation, mountains, deserts and seas.

When did anarcho-capitalism start?

Anarcho-capitalism first emerged in the 1970s and 1980s, partly due to growing criticism in the west of government regulation of capitalism and a revival of interest in free market economics.

Who owns property in capitalism?

private ownership
Capitalism is an economic system characterized by private ownership of the means of production, especially in the industrial sector. Capitalism depends on the enforcement of private property rights, which provide incentives for investment in and productive use of productive capital.

Is anarcho‐​capitalism workable?

For evidence that this system is workable, anarchocapitalists point to the 19th‐​century American West, medieval Iceland, and Anglo‐​Saxon England. Because anarcho‐​capitalism is predicated on a capitalist economic system, it requires markets, property, and the rule of law. (Many anarchists reject one or more of these elements.

Can non-state public property exist in an anarcho-capitalist society?

Though anarcho-capitalists are known for asserting a right to private (individualized or joint non-public) property, some propose that non-state public or community property can also exist in an anarcho-capitalist society. For them, what is important is that it is acquired and transferred without help or hindrance from the compulsory state.

Why do anti-capitalists consider anarcho-capitalism as a contradiction?

Anti-capitalist anarchists generally consider anarcho-capitalism as a contradiction in terms. Anarchists argue that the state is an initiation of force because force can be used against those who have not stolen private property, vandalized private property, assaulted anyone, or committed fraud.

What are the main arguments of the anarchist movement?

Anarchists argue that the state is an initiation of force because force can be used against those who have not stolen private property, vandalized private property, assaulted anyone, or committed fraud. Many also argue that monopolies tend to be corrupt and inefficient.