How do historical principles differ from current time slice principles?

Historical Principles: distributive principles that depends upon how a distribution came about. Current Time-Slice Principles (End-Result Principles): justice of a distribution is determined by how things are distributed, based on structural principles.

What is a current time slice principle?

Current time-slice principle (CTSP) is based on how things are currently distributed, as opposed to how they had been distributed in the past, and how they came into their current distribution.

Why does Nozick disagree with patterned principles of justice?

Re-Distribution of Wealth is Unjust: Nozick criticizes patterned theories (e.g., Rawls), because he believes they will all run up against one basic problem. The resulting distribution is just—because it is the result of a just transfer. After all, the people FREELY gave their money to Wilt in order to watch him.

What is a patterned principle?

A principle is patterned if “it specifies that a distribution is to vary along with some natural dimension, weighted sum of natural dimensions, or lexicographic ordering of natural dimensions”.

Does Nozick favor current time slice principles of distribution?

Nozick calls these principles end-result (or end-state) principles. Typically, egalitarianism is understood not as a current time slice principle but as an end-result principle—holding that distributions are justified to the degree that they promote equality.

What does Nozick mean by a historical view of distributive justice?

This gives us Nozick’s entitlement theory of distributive justice: a distribution of wealth obtaining in a society as a whole is a just distribution if everyone in that society is entitled to what he has, i.e. has gotten his holdings in accordance with the principles of acquisition, transfer, and rectification.

What is Nozick’s theory of distributive justice?

What does Nozick mean by justice in transfer?

Justice in transfer: According to “justice in transfer,” a person who acquires a holding justly in transfer from another who is entitled to that holding is entitled to that holding, i.e. how ownership and possession of property can subsequently be transferred from one person to another, provided that the transfer is …

What is Nozick’s distributive justice?

What Nozick thinks about distributive justice?

Talk about “distributive justice” is inherently misleading, Nozick argues, in that it seems to imply that there is some central authority who “distributes” to individuals shares of wealth and income that pre-exist the distribution, as if they had appeared like “manna from heaven.” Of course this is not really the way …

What did Nozick believe in?

With respect to political philosophy, Nozick was a right-libertarian, which in short means he accepted the idea that individuals own themselves and have a right to private property.

What are Nozick’s three principles of justice?

We have seen that Nozick’s theory is based on three key principles. Nozick put forward the claim that, inorder to deserve something, a person must be entitled to it according to the principle of justice in acquisition, the principle of justice in transfer, or the principle of rectification.

What does Nozick mean by principle of distribution patterned?

In the opinion of Nozick : “Let us call a principle of distribution patterned if it specifies that a distribution is to vary along with some natural dimension (emphasis added), weighted sum of natural dimensions, or lexicographic ordering of natural dimensions”. Distribution of things, rights etc. should be controlled by other criteria.

Are the time-slice principles also called unhistorical principles?

We thus come across the idea that the time-slice principles are also called unhistorical principles. Time-slice principles, end-result principles and unhistorical principles according to Nozick denote almost same thing. Noman Barry and many others say that utilitarianism and social justice theories are end-state doctrines.

What are the aspects of justice according to Nozick?

The only other aspect of justice is rectification, the principle which allows past injustices that is unfair acquisition to be corrected”. Nozick’s theory of justice, sketched above, is a theory of entitlement and since it is a theory of entitlement it is also theory of acquisition or holding of property.

Who is Robert Nozick and what is his philosophy?

Robert Nozick’s Political Philosophy. Robert Nozick (1938–2002) was a renowned American philosopher who first came to be widely known through his 1974 book, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974), which won the National Book Award for Philosophy and Religion in 1975.