Guidelines

Are making deepfakes illegal?

Are making deepfakes illegal?

If expanded to deepfakes, content creators may have to state when their video is not real. The state of California has already experimented with banning deepfakes, enacting a law last year that made it illegal to create or distribute deepfakes of politicians within 60 days of an election[2].

Can you sue for deepfakes?

So far only one state, California, has passed a law addressing this issue. Gavin Newsom signed a law that allows individuals to sue someone who has created a deepfake that makes their likeness appear in pornographic images or videos, even if the content is labeled as fake.

Are Deepfakes illegal in US?

The 2021 NDAA, which became law when Congress recently voted to override U.S. President Donald Trump’s veto, requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to issue an annual report for the next five years on deepfakes. Texas was the first, banning deepfakes designed to influence an election in 2019.

READ ALSO:   Can I be sued for speaking the truth?

Why should deep fakes be banned?

Deepfakes pose many potential systemic socio-political risks such as manipulation of civil discourse, interference with elections and national security, as well as the erosion of trust in journalism and public institutions more generally.

Is deepfake illegal UK?

The UK currently has no laws specifically targeting deepfakes and there is no ‘deepfake intellectual property right’ that could be invoked in a dispute. If a celebrity is depicted engaging in lewd, offensive or illegal conduct in a deepfake, they may be able to claim for defamation.

How many deepfakes are there?

Broadly speaking, there are two types of deepfakes. Those that are wholly generated by AI, such as the fake human faces on www.thispersondoesnotexist.com, and others that use elements of AI to manipulate authentic media.

What are the implications of deep fakes?

Deepfakes, they wrote, can potentially distort democratic discourse; manipulate elections; erode trust in institutions; jeopardize public safety and national security; damage reputations; and undermine journalism.