Are grades an accurate representation of learning?
Table of Contents
Are grades an accurate representation of learning?
Grades are meant to be a representation of the overall mastery and performance of the student in a class. The “real world” of grading is a bit different. Grades are like points scored in a game. They are a measure of how well you have “scored,” but not always a measure of your efforts and learning.”
How do bad grades affect students?
Some education researchers have even concluded that grades “depressed creativity, fostered fear of failure, and weakened students’ interest.” These effects are amplified in low achievers who experience “dramatic declines” in academic interest upon receiving low scores.
What is the case against grades about?
In the Article ” The Case Against Grades,” (2011) Alfie Kohn argues his position against grades and their destructive manner towards students. He elaborates his point of view through research that suggests how grades tend to diminish students interest, creativity, and drive.
What is the purpose of grades in school?
1. The primary purpose of the grading system is to clearly, accurately, consistently, and fairly communicate learning progress and achievement to students, families, postsecondary institutions, and prospective employers.
Do grades reflect student learning?
Grades reflect many things other than student learning – For example, grades reflect participation variables like discussion, cooperation, attendance, verbal ability, which do not reflect course content and mastery.
Why are grades not accurate representation of intelligence?
Grades are less important than comprehension. A lot of what you will find on a typical written test is based on rote memorization. Facts and stats simply spilled onto a page without much context or need for deeper problem-solving. This approach cannot accurately measure abilities.